Cadeia de valorRecomendação de registo disponível · consola do fornecedor em piloto

O conselho dos vossos agrónomos, como um registo que se defende.

Para o distribuidor, retalhista ou rede de agentes cujo produto é um conselho que termina numa venda — e que tem de resistir a uma auditoria.

Espaço de trabalho de colheita, classificação e lotes do FuroField
Espaço de trabalho do produto · dados de demonstração ilustrativos
Recomendação de registo disponível · consola do fornecedor em pilotoO mandato de consentimento, o cadastro de agrónomos e a recomendação de registo estão publicados na API do FuroField e acessíveis hoje a partir de um espaço de trabalho de machamba. A consola de rede do lado do fornecedor é trabalho de piloto, não uma superfície já entregue, e as verificações de limites de resíduos por mercado devolvem indisponível nomeando a autoridade, em vez de darem um passe.

Um distribuidor de proteção de culturas não vende, no fundo, química. Vende o juízo de um agrónomo que percorre o bloco, nomeia um alvo, escolhe uma substância ativa e uma dose, e a escreve — e é desse juízo que a venda decorre. Esse conselho é ao mesmo tempo o produto, a margem e a responsabilidade, e em grande parte do setor vive num email, numa fotografia de WhatsApp ou num livro de duplicados atrás do banco da carrinha.

Isto não é um problema de arquivo. Vender um remédio agrícola para um uso diferente do que consta do rótulo é uma infração do vendedor, não do comprador, e numa rede de franquia ou de agentes essa exposição fica distribuída por dezenas de conselheiros independentes enquanto os registos estão na sede. A norma de auditoria a que os vossos produtores são certificados já exige que o registo de aplicação identifique quem decidiu o uso e a dose — e aceita um email como prova de competência, que é precisamente a razão pela qual ninguém nunca o estruturou.

O FuroField transforma essa decisão num objeto: quem recomendou o quê, sob que credencial, contra que alvo, para que mercado de destino, e se o produtor aceitou. O parecer que o agrónomo tinha à frente no momento em que decidiu fica congelado no registo e nunca é recalculado, porque voltar a derivá-lo mais tarde reescreve em silêncio o que uma pessoa sabia quando decidiu — que é exatamente aquilo que uma auditoria está a perguntar.

O problema

The advice is a legal act, and nothing makes it auditable

Six registers describe the life of an agricultural input — what was advanced on credit, what may legally be sprayed and at what interval, who supplied it, what a cohort should buy, what was actually applied, and whether the lot is still sellable into its market. Almost nobody joins them, and none of them records the human who decided. When an active is withdrawn or a residue query lands, the answer is assembled by phone.

  • Recommendations issued as free text, with no link to the product register that says what is legal
  • Off-label exposure distributed across independent advisors, sitting on head office's registrations
  • Advisor accreditations and operator certificates expiring with nothing watching them
  • No way to answer which growers' programmes just broke when an active is withdrawn
  • Sold-quantity returns and rebate accrual reconciled in email, from the one dataset only the distributor holds
Como funciona

Do primeiro registo a algo sobre o qual pode agir

01

Register the advisors, and their interest

Each advisor organisation carries its kind, its accreditation and expiry, and a declared funding interest — whether the person giving the advice is paid out of the margin on what they recommend. The declaration is a database constraint, not a convention, and it renders at the same weight as the advice everywhere the advice appears.

02

Issue the recommendation against the register

The advisor picks a target and a product from the registered-product register rather than typing a name. The gate runs before the commit: label rate, pre-harvest and re-entry intervals, resistance group, destination-market residue limit, operator certificate. What the advisor was told is stored with the recommendation.

03

Let the grower accept it

A recommendation is a proposal, never a write. It creates nothing on the farm until the grower accepts, and only then can it attach to a task or a demand line. A recommendation the recipient never agreed to is advice, and it stays labelled as advice.

04

Read the exposure, not the archive

Four views: what is breaching a gate now, what advice is live, what an active being pulled would cost across the book, and what was recommended by whom. The withdrawal-impact list is the one that turns a fortnight of phone calls into a screen.

O que recebe

Em detalhe

A recommendation of record

Who decided, under what credential, against which target, for which market, and whether the grower agreed — the link GLOBALG.A.P. IFA CB 7.3.4 makes mandatory and leaves entirely unshaped.

Withdrawal impact across the book

When a registration is pulled or a market moves a residue limit, the programmes that just broke are a query rather than a call list — with the growers, blocks and advisors already attached.

A consent edge you cannot award yourself

The farm grants the mandate, narrows its scope, pauses it and revokes it. A supplier reads inside that scope and writes nothing; the mutating routes answer 403 to the supplier by design. A consent the interested party can grant itself is not consent.

The competitor rule, enforced in the read path

A grower buys from several distributors. You see your own advisors' recommendations on that farm and never a rival's — filtered in the query and again in the row-level policy, not by a flag somebody could set. There is deliberately no scope key that widens it.

An access log on the farm's trail

Every cross-tenant read is written onto the grower's own audit trail — allowed or refused, with the row count — by the read path itself, so a reader cannot decline to be logged. A mandate list says who may look; only this says who did.

Advice described, never steered

The mix view carries no price, no cost, no margin and no supplier ranking. A screen that ranked advice by margin would make the funding-interest disclosure a lie, and that disclosure is the part a manufacturer's own platform structurally cannot offer.

Para quem é

Feito para estas operações

Crop-protection and plant-nutrition distributors with a field agronomy network
Agri-retailers and franchised or agency dealer networks
Registration holders and manufacturers with stewardship and sold-quantity obligations
Perguntas

Sobre fornecedores de insumos e distribuidores

Are you selling farm software to our growers?

No, and the distinction matters commercially. This is a console over your own advisor network's advice, priced on advisors rather than on the hectares your customers farm. Your growers do not have to adopt anything for a recommendation to be recorded; where a grower does run FuroField, a mandate they grant lets you see the advice your own people gave them, and nothing else.

We have already invested in an agronomy or imagery platform. Does this replace it?

It should not, and we will say so in the first meeting rather than the third. Satellite imagery, scouting apps and agronomy planners answer what is happening in the field. This answers who decided, under what authority, and what breaks when a registration moves — which is an assurance question, and it composes with a platform you already own instead of competing with it.

Do you take a margin on the products our advisors recommend?

Never. No commission, no rebate and no referral fee from any input or technology supplier, which is the reason a funding-interest disclosure on this platform is worth anything at all. Advice with an undisclosed interest in the answer is not advice, and that applies to us before it applies to anyone on your network.

Can we see this working before committing?

The recommendation of record, the advisor register and the consent mandate are live on the production API and test-pinned. The supplier-side console is the open edge — it signs in and lands on a farm workspace rather than a network view, and wiring it is scoped pilot work rather than a roadmap intention. We would rather tell you that now than have you find it in a security review.

What about the residue limits for the markets our growers export into?

The gate is built and the reference authority is populated. Market-scoped checks against a commercial registration database report unavailable and name the authority they could not reach, rather than returning a pass — an absent check must never look like a clear one. Closing that is a subscription, and it is on the pilot's cost line, not hidden in ours.

Ponha os seus talhões no mapa esta época

Comece grátis até 25 hectares — sem cartão. Cresça ao hectare à medida que a operação cresce.